Only two operators write the threshold as a number

What the other seven wrote instead

The remaining seven publish no amount. They use phrasing instead: risk-based, at the company’s discretion, where the company considers it necessary.

The crypto casino korea comparison records that state as “case by case”, kept apart from “not published”. Not published means we could not find a sentence on the subject.

Case by case means we found the sentence and the sentence sets no amount.

In practice the difference is small. Either way a reader cannot work out in advance which withdrawal will trigger a document request.

As a record, though, the two are not the same thing, and this site does not flatten them together.

The affiliate row gets the same rule

The top row of the table carries an affiliate mark. Its identity-check cell reads case by case.

Clause 8.7 of those terms lets the company require documents before a payout at its own discretion, and gives 14 days to supply them once asked. No amount appears in that clause either.

Having a commercial relationship does not change how the cell is filled. Changing it would cost the table the only thing it has.

The principle is written down on the editorial team page.

Documents asked for, and what happens to them

The list varies. Some operators want an identity document only; others add proof of address and proof that the payment method belongs to you.

Where a passport is required, a reader holding only Korean-language documents needs time to prepare.

The item that goes missing most often is retention. How long submitted documents are held, and when they are destroyed, is written into few sets of terms.

Where it is absent, a reader has no way to know how long a copy of their identity document survives.

What happens to a balance if documents are refused belongs in the same reading pass. That clause usually sits near the forfeiture wording, and what safe means here shows where to look for it.

How to read the phrase “no verification”

“No verification” is used to mean that no documents are asked for at sign-up. That is true as far as the registration screen.

None of the nine sets of terms we read contains a promise not to ask at the withdrawal. Most contain the opposite sentence: that documents may be required whenever the company thinks it necessary.

So an easy sign-up and an easy withdrawal are separate claims. What actually holds money up at the payout stage is set out in withdrawal limits.

One operator writes down a deadline

How many days you get to supply documents after they are requested is another thing terms can state. One operator in the table does: 14 days, written into the same clause 8.7.

No deadline clause was visible in the other terms we read.

The absence is not a concession to the reader. It runs the other way. Where a deadline exists, whether you met it is the thing in dispute; where none exists, what should have been supplied and by when gets decided afterwards.

The re-submission path deserves the same look. How many times a document can be sent again after being rejected on formatting, and what happens to the balance in between, appears in none of the nine sets of terms we read.