Four operators publish a cap with a clause number

A cap and an installment threshold are different clauses

The affiliate row at the top of the table has no ceiling per period. It has a different kind of clause: amounts above 50,000 USDT are paid out in parts, in clause 8.8.

Collapsing those two into one cell would make the table lie. A ceiling means you cannot receive more than that. An installment threshold means the same money arrives in pieces.

The total is not the same number.

So each cell of the Korean crypto casino comparison says which rule it is. Comparing two operators on the figure alone reverses the answer.

One operator publishes a processing time

The question searched for more often than the cap is when the money lands. In this table exactly one operator answers it in its terms: up to 3 days, clause 8.1.

The other nine processing cells are empty. Where speed is advertised, the wording sits on a promotions page rather than in the terms, and a promotions page changes without notice.

There is a second split worth making. The moment an operator broadcasts a transaction and the moment that transaction confirms are not the same moment.

Where the terms leave out which of the two moments a speed claim refers to, that claim cannot be compared against anything.

How to read an empty cell

Five cells in the cap column are empty. None of them means that the operator has no limit.

They record that we did not find a cap clause in the documents we read. The clause may live in another document, or the version we read may differ from the version published now.

Neither possibility supports a claim that no cap exists.

The rule that keeps an empty cell from being read as zero, or as unlimited, is set out in how the ranking is scored. Without it, an operator that publishes less would score better.

What usually stops a payout is not the cap

In practice a withdrawal stalls at the identity check more often than at a ceiling. Payment is held from the moment documents are requested, and it stays held while the documents supplied do not match the required form.

Seven of the ten operators set no amount at which that request is triggered. A request can arrive at any withdrawal, and the clause numbers are collected in identity checks.

Where the payout is in a stablecoin, the chain question stacks on top of that. Which networks an operator supports is dealt with in Tether casinos.

Different periods are not laid side by side here

Two of the four caps in the table are weekly and two are monthly. Multiplying the weekly figures by four would line all four up in one column.

This site does not do that multiplication.

The arithmetic is not wrong, but the resulting figure is a sentence we wrote rather than one the operator wrote. How many weeks make a month for the purpose of the clause, when the period resets, and whether an unused balance carries over all vary, and are mostly unwritten.

So each figure enters the table in the unit its clause used: per week on the weekly ones, per month on the monthly ones. A reader comparing two operators meets the difference in units first, and that is the most honest thing this table can do.